Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 15/10/2013 14:43, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
Paolo, or maybe Andreas,
To go beyond RFC with this series, I need to explain why isa-i8259 and
kvm-i8259 cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, or drop that. I'd
appreciate your help.
Both
Il 16/10/2013 11:51, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
Let me try to elaborate, to make sure I understand.
Unlike ordinary ISA devices, the i8259 devices need additional wiring,
done by code.
For instance, board code like pc_q35_init(), pc_piix.c's pc_init1(),
mips_malta_init(), ... wire up
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 16/10/2013 11:51, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
Let me try to elaborate, to make sure I understand.
Unlike ordinary ISA devices, the i8259 devices need additional wiring,
done by code.
For instance, board code like pc_q35_init(), pc_piix.c's
Il 16/10/2013 18:21, BALATON Zoltan ha scritto:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 16/10/2013 11:51, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
Let me try to elaborate, to make sure I understand.
Unlike ordinary ISA devices, the i8259 devices need additional wiring,
done by code.
For
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 16/10/2013 11:51, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
Let me try to elaborate, to make sure I understand.
Unlike ordinary ISA devices, the i8259 devices need additional wiring,
done by code.
For instance, board code like pc_q35_init(), pc_piix.c's
Paolo, or maybe Andreas,
To go beyond RFC with this series, I need to explain why isa-i8259 and
kvm-i8259 cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, or drop that. I'd
appreciate your help.
Both are derived from TYPE_PIC_COMMON, which is derived from
TYPE_ISA_DEVICE.
I figure isa-i8259
Il 15/10/2013 14:43, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
Paolo, or maybe Andreas,
To go beyond RFC with this series, I need to explain why isa-i8259 and
kvm-i8259 cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, or drop that. I'd
appreciate your help.
Both are derived from TYPE_PIC_COMMON, which is
