Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-04-02 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 01 April 2010 18:42:27 Alexander Graf wrote: > On 01.04.2010, at 15:49, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Am 26.03.2010 um 03:44 schrieb Rob Landley: > >> According to "qemu-system-ppc -M ?", g3beige is still the default. The > >> mac99 machine is the default for ppc64. (Are there newworlds t

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-04-02 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 01 April 2010 16:33:09 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 03:34:00PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > Reverting that patch fixed it (git show HEAD | patch -R -p1), by which I > > mean three consecutive runs with 30 second timeout didn't trigger the > > hang detection. > > I ha

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-04-02 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:42:27AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 01.04.2010, at 15:49, Andreas Färber wrote: > > > > > Am 26.03.2010 um 03:44 schrieb Rob Landley: > > > >> According to "qemu-system-ppc -M ?", g3beige is still the default. The > >> mac99 > >> machine is the default for p

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-04-01 Thread Alexander Graf
On 01.04.2010, at 15:49, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Am 26.03.2010 um 03:44 schrieb Rob Landley: > >> According to "qemu-system-ppc -M ?", g3beige is still the default. The mac99 >> machine is the default for ppc64. (Are there newworlds that run a 32 bit ppc >> instead of a 64 bit ppc?) > > Th

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-04-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 03:34:00PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > I have a native build under qemu that gets killed if it doesn't produce a > line > of output for 60 seconds (hang detection enforced by the host monitoring > qemu's stdout with --nographic, not from within qemu). > > In the most rec

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-04-01 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 26.03.2010 um 03:44 schrieb Rob Landley: According to "qemu-system-ppc -M ?", g3beige is still the default. The mac99 machine is the default for ppc64. (Are there newworlds that run a 32 bit ppc instead of a 64 bit ppc?) There are. All G3 and G4 PowerMacs, iMacs, iBooks were ppc32 AF

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-28 Thread Rob Landley
On Sunday 28 March 2010 09:57:09 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > If you want the code actually cleaned up instead of minimally changed, > > here's a stab at that. (Unfortunately I haven't got a ppc64 setup to > > test it with yet, but ppc32 still works.) > > Not necessarily a code cleanup, but at least

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-28 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:01:39PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On Saturday 27 March 2010 07:32:41 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:47:51PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > > On Friday 26 March 2010 14:00:00 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > I am pretty fine applying a correct patch if

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-27 Thread Rob Landley
On Saturday 27 March 2010 07:32:41 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:47:51PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > On Friday 26 March 2010 14:00:00 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > I am pretty fine applying a correct patch if you send a new one. > > > > By which you mean rip out the whole #ifde

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:47:51PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On Friday 26 March 2010 14:00:00 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > I'm not asking anyone to care about me personally, I'm asking them to > > > care about specific technical issues. If those issues don't interest > > > you, they don't interes

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-26 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 26 March 2010 14:00:00 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > I'm not asking anyone to care about me personally, I'm asking them to > > care about specific technical issues. If those issues don't interest > > you, they don't interest you. > > > > Speaking of ppc, last month I sent this patch: > > > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-26 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:53:02AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > > As far as I can tell the sh4 linux-kernel maintainer officially doesn't > > > care about anybody who isn't employed by his company, so I'm not sure I > > > still care about supporting that platform. It's not real hardware, it's > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-26 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 25 March 2010 18:25:41 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:33:33PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > On Thursday 25 March 2010 04:20:26 Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > > > 2010/3/24 Rob Landley : > > > > I have a native build under qemu that gets killed if it doesn't > > > > produc

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-25 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 25 March 2010 18:57:00 Alexander Graf wrote: > > This has been broken in r680 of openbios. I haven't found time to find > > the real problem though. > > Ugh. > > Yeah, I really need to look into it again. It's probably something really > simple. 99% of the code was if(newworld) conditio

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-25 Thread Alexander Graf
On 26.03.2010, at 00:25, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:33:33PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: >> On Thursday 25 March 2010 04:20:26 Artyom Tarasenko wrote: >>> 2010/3/24 Rob Landley : I have a native build under qemu that gets killed if it doesn't produce a line of outpu

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:33:33PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On Thursday 25 March 2010 04:20:26 Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > > 2010/3/24 Rob Landley : > > > I have a native build under qemu that gets killed if it doesn't produce a > > > line of output for 60 seconds (hang detection enforced by the h

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-25 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 25 March 2010 04:20:26 Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > 2010/3/24 Rob Landley : > > I have a native build under qemu that gets killed if it doesn't produce a > > line of output for 60 seconds (hang detection enforced by the host > > monitoring qemu's stdout with --nographic, not from within qe

Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-25 Thread Artyom Tarasenko
2010/3/24 Rob Landley : > I have a native build under qemu that gets killed if it doesn't produce a line > of output for 60 seconds (hang detection enforced by the host monitoring > qemu's stdout with --nographic, not from within qemu). > > In the most recent release version, it never came close to

[Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.

2010-03-24 Thread Rob Landley
I have a native build under qemu that gets killed if it doesn't produce a line of output for 60 seconds (hang detection enforced by the host monitoring qemu's stdout with --nographic, not from within qemu). In the most recent release version, it never came close to triggering on mips with a 30