On 03/08/06, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Andrzej,
Sunday, July 30, 2006, 4:29:41 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> On 30/07/06, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello qemu-devel,
>>
>> I wonder, what's the state of TI OMAP patch, previously announced on
>> the list by
> > I don't think it is considered for inclusion. Before it is merged I
> > would like to separate the generic OMAP code from board-related code
> > (the board I emulate is the Palm Tunsgten|E handheld), but I imagine
> > the QEMU maintainers won't like the way code is formatted and probably
> > ma
Hello Andrzej,
Sunday, July 30, 2006, 4:29:41 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> On 30/07/06, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello qemu-devel,
>>
>> I wonder, what's the state of TI OMAP patch, previously announced on
>> the list by Andrzej Zaborowski
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qe
Hi,
On 30/07/06, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello qemu-devel,
I wonder, what's the state of TI OMAP patch, previously announced on
the list by Andrzej Zaborowski
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-03/msg00125.html ?
Is it considered for inclusion in the mainline
Hello qemu-devel,
I wonder, what's the state of TI OMAP patch, previously announced on
the list by Andrzej Zaborowski
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-03/msg00125.html ?
Is it considered for inclusion in the mainline? If not, what precludes
that?
--
Best regards,
Paul
