sun4m.c and sun4u.c both define a qdev named TYPE_OPENPROM. As far as I
can tell, they differ only in the name of their memory region.
If they ever get linked into the same executable,
type_register_internal() will reject the second one. But they aren't,
so this isn't a bug. Is it bad style?
On 29 October 2013 07:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> sun4m.c and sun4u.c both define a qdev named TYPE_OPENPROM. As far as I
> can tell, they differ only in the name of their memory region.
>
> If they ever get linked into the same executable,
> type_register_internal() will reject the second one
On 29/10/13 14:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 29 October 2013 07:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
sun4m.c and sun4u.c both define a qdev named TYPE_OPENPROM. As far as I
can tell, they differ only in the name of their memory region.
If they ever get linked into the same executable,
type_register_in
