as far as i remember i had to put the same code into softmmu_header.h to
get correct results.
i found it easiest to do this in the ld/st macros in these files (~6
places in code)
This probably sounds stupid but whats the best way to get debug
output? Due to the code generation magic qemu does,
Am Montag, den 18.12.2006, 00:56 -0800 schrieb Diwaker Gupta:
as far as i remember i had to put the same code into softmmu_header.h to
get correct results.
i found it easiest to do this in the ld/st macros in these files (~6
places in code)
This probably sounds stupid but whats the best
Am Samstag, den 16.12.2006, 23:19 -0800 schrieb Diwaker Gupta:
On 12/16/06, Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:42:46PM -0800, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
o do these changes seem correct? As in, do they actually track the
read/write memory accesses done by the
Hi list,
I've searched the archives and the forums, but couldn't get a specific
solution (I think my search terms might have been too general).
Anyways, I think what I'm trying to do should be relatively easy and
hopefully experts here will be able to quickly point me in the right
direction :)
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:42:46PM -0800, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
o do these changes seem correct? As in, do they actually track the
read/write memory accesses done by the guest? I was concerned because
when I start a guest, I see a whole lot of writes and not as many
reads, which seems a little
On 12/16/06, Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:42:46PM -0800, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
o do these changes seem correct? As in, do they actually track the
read/write memory accesses done by the guest? I was concerned because
when I start a guest, I see a whole
