Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-21 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Mulyadi Santosa wrote: If I may jump into the pool... I plan to work around the MinGW issue by guarding the offending part by #ifdef GCC..., even if I have been told that it works only by chance (but it works, whereas any other option I tried does not).

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-21 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 21.01.2008 um 12:18 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: The miniops right now are implemented as plain C commands. If the good gcc guys would not have insisted on not having an option to force the ret or jmp statement at the end of the function, we could use them for _all_ processors. As it

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-21 Thread Julian Seward
As it is, Fabrice's code generator will most likely be something similar to Paul's qops, which means that you have to invent a primitive C in which to write the miniops, and you will have to write a backend for _each_ and _every_ host CPU you support. It's not a terribly big deal.

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-21 Thread Ronan Keryell
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:18:53 + (GMT), Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Johannes The miniops right now are implemented as plain C commands. Johannes If the good gcc guys would not have insisted on not having Johannes an option to force the ret or jmp statement at the

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-21 Thread Paul Brook
Well, what about adding a new backend phase to gcc generating what we expect for our purpose? Ok, it is rather easy to have a branch in gcc, harder to have it accepted in the main-stream gcc... :-) With a good argumentation... IMHO (as a full time gcc developer) it's easier to just implement

Re : [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-20 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
I think you dont answer his question. ;) Kind regards, Sylvain Petreolle (aka Usurp) - Message d'origine De : Jérôme PRIOR [EMAIL PROTECTED] À : qemu-devel@nongnu.org Envoyé le : Dimanche, 20 Janvier 2008, 19h40mn 29s Objet : Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please could you

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 20 January 2008, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: I think you dont answer his question. ;) his question is bogus. if he spent 5 seconds reading the archives, it isnt like people arent considering supporting gcc 4. having people type all caps e-mails contributes nothing. either put up and

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-20 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: having people type all caps e-mails contributes nothing. I disagree: it makes it easier to spot whom to ignore. Unless you know that person, of course, and respect her, too. Ciao, Dscho

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 20 January 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: having people type all caps e-mails contributes nothing. I disagree: it makes it easier to spot whom to ignore. Unless you know that person, of course, and respect her, too. yes, the caps flags

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 20 January 2008, Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote: Ignoring the fact that the original poster wrote in all caps and can't contribute much to qemu development, what is being done or who can give directions on what would have to be done to make qemu build using gcc4. I'd prefer it too that

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-20 Thread Sunil Amitkumar Janki
On Jan 20, 2008 11:26 PM, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 20 January 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: having people type all caps e-mails contributes nothing. I disagree: it makes it easier to spot whom to ignore. Unless you

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-20 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 20.01.2008 um 23:38 schrieb Sunil Amitkumar Janki: Ignoring the fact that the original poster wrote in all caps and can't contribute much to qemu development, what is being done or who can give directions on what would have to be done to make qemu build using gcc4. I'd prefer it too that I

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-20 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 20.01.2008 um 23:38 schrieb Sunil Amitkumar Janki: Ignoring the fact that the original poster wrote in all caps and can't contribute much to qemu development, what is being done or who can give directions on what would have to be done

Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-20 Thread Alexander Graf
On Jan 21, 2008, at 4:39 AM, Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi... If I may jump into the pool... I plan to work around the MinGW issue by guarding the offending part by #ifdef GCC..., even if I have been told that it works only by chance (but it works, whereas any other option I tried does

[Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please

2008-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
could you please consider supporting gcc 4 ? SERVIZIO VOICE: TELEFONA e INVIA SMS dal tuo computer a tariffe vantaggiose! Scopri come telefonare e videochiamare gratis da pc a pc. http://voice.repubblica.it