Peter Maydell writes:
> On 5 March 2013 13:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> For many years, qemu defaults to 128Mb of guest RAM size.
>> Today, this is just too small, and many OSes fails to boot
>> with this size, more, they fail to produce any reasonable
>> messages either (eg, windows7 just cras
On 7 March 2013 09:21, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 12:34:53 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 6 March 2013 11:59, Rob Landley wrote:
>> > 256 can be handled by most things.
>>
>> I'm going to take a wild guess that Windows 7 doesn't do any
>> better in 256MB than it does with 128 :-)
>
>
> Wh
On 03/06/2013 12:34:53 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 6 March 2013 11:59, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 12:09:27 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 5 March 2013 14:07, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:40:38PM +0800, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 5 March 2013 13:26,
06.03.2013 22:47, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:34:53AM +0800, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I'm going to take a wild guess that Windows 7 doesn't do any
>> better in 256MB than it does with 128 :-)
Actually it does. With 128Mb it crashes. With 256Mb it says it
wants more memo
On 6 March 2013 11:59, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 12:09:27 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 5 March 2013 14:07, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:40:38PM +0800, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 5 March 2013 13:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> >> > For many years, qemu
On 03/05/2013 12:09:27 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 5 March 2013 14:07, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:40:38PM +0800, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 5 March 2013 13:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> > For many years, qemu defaults to 128Mb of guest RAM size.
>> > Today, this is
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:34:53AM +0800, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 March 2013 11:59, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On 03/05/2013 12:09:27 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 5 March 2013 14:07, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:40:38PM +0800, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> >> O
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 5 March 2013 13:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> For many years, qemu defaults to 128Mb of guest RAM size.
>> Today, this is just too small, and many OSes fails to boot
>> with this size, more, they fail to produce any reasonable
>> messages either (eg, windows7 just cras
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:26:32AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> For many years, qemu defaults to 128Mb of guest RAM size.
> Today, this is just too small, and many OSes fails to boot
> with this size, more, they fail to produce any reasonable
> messages either (eg, windows7 just crashes at start
On 5 March 2013 14:07, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:40:38PM +0800, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 5 March 2013 13:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> > For many years, qemu defaults to 128Mb of guest RAM size.
>> > Today, this is just too small, and many OSes fails to boot
>> > wi
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:40:38PM +0800, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 March 2013 13:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > For many years, qemu defaults to 128Mb of guest RAM size.
> > Today, this is just too small, and many OSes fails to boot
> > with this size, more, they fail to produce any reasonable
On 5 March 2013 13:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> For many years, qemu defaults to 128Mb of guest RAM size.
> Today, this is just too small, and many OSes fails to boot
> with this size, more, they fail to produce any reasonable
> messages either (eg, windows7 just crashes at startup).
If you make
For many years, qemu defaults to 128Mb of guest RAM size.
Today, this is just too small, and many OSes fails to boot
with this size, more, they fail to produce any reasonable
messages either (eg, windows7 just crashes at startup).
Some distributions (eg ubuntu) had a local patch to increase
this v
13 matches
Mail list logo
