On 4 September 2011 18:42, Antti P Miettinen wrote:
> The emulation
> speed depends on how core intensive vs memory intensive your workload
> is. Workloads that are memory bound in the target (e.g. gzip ASCII
> compression) can me emulated much faster (e.g. factor of two) than core
> bound workloa
Julien Heyman writes:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had some data regarding the relative performance of
> any given ARM board emulated in QEMU versus the real thing. Yes, I do know
> this depends a lot on the host PC running qemu, but some ballpark/example
> figures would help. Say, I emulat
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Julien Heyman wrote:
> Thanks Dave.
> I use system emulation, and my main concern is "just" to know that the
> actual board will run faster than the emulation. So based on your example,
> and even though my target board (mini2440) is nowhere as fast as a Panda
> boa
On 2 September 2011 17:04, Julien Heyman wrote:
> Thanks Dave.
> I use system emulation, and my main concern is "just" to know that the
> actual board will run faster than the emulation. So based on your example,
> and even though my target board (mini2440) is nowhere as fast as a Panda
> board, t
Thanks Dave.
I use system emulation, and my main concern is "just" to know that the
actual board will run faster than the emulation. So based on your example,
and even though my target board (mini2440) is nowhere as fast as a Panda
board, this should be the case by a comfortable margin. Now, as I a
On 1 September 2011 08:32, Julien Heyman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had some data regarding the relative performance
> of any given ARM board emulated in QEMU versus the real thing. Yes, I do
> know this depends a lot on the host PC running qemu, but some
> ballpark/example figures
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had some data regarding the relative performance
of any given ARM board emulated in QEMU versus the real thing. Yes, I do
know this depends a lot on the host PC running qemu, but some
ballpark/example figures would help. Say, I emulate a 400 Mhz ARM9 processor
on a C