Julien Heyman bidsom...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had some data regarding the relative performance of
any given ARM board emulated in QEMU versus the real thing. Yes, I do know
this depends a lot on the host PC running qemu, but some ballpark/example
figures would help.
On 4 September 2011 18:42, Antti P Miettinen anan...@iki.fi wrote:
The emulation
speed depends on how core intensive vs memory intensive your workload
is. Workloads that are memory bound in the target (e.g. gzip ASCII
compression) can me emulated much faster (e.g. factor of two) than core
On 1 September 2011 08:32, Julien Heyman bidsom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had some data regarding the relative performance
of any given ARM board emulated in QEMU versus the real thing. Yes, I do
know this depends a lot on the host PC running qemu, but some
Thanks Dave.
I use system emulation, and my main concern is just to know that the
actual board will run faster than the emulation. So based on your example,
and even though my target board (mini2440) is nowhere as fast as a Panda
board, this should be the case by a comfortable margin. Now, as I am
On 2 September 2011 17:04, Julien Heyman bidsom...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Dave.
I use system emulation, and my main concern is just to know that the
actual board will run faster than the emulation. So based on your example,
and even though my target board (mini2440) is nowhere as fast as a
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Julien Heyman bidsom...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Dave.
I use system emulation, and my main concern is just to know that the
actual board will run faster than the emulation. So based on your example,
and even though my target board (mini2440) is nowhere as fast as
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had some data regarding the relative performance
of any given ARM board emulated in QEMU versus the real thing. Yes, I do
know this depends a lot on the host PC running qemu, but some
ballpark/example figures would help. Say, I emulate a 400 Mhz ARM9 processor
on a
