Il 27/03/2014 04:45, Gonglei (Arei) ha scritto:
arch_init.c | 25 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Should this patch be included in 2.0 as a bug fix? The rest of the
series is probably better off in 2.1.
Yes, it should be, but I am not so clear how
> > arch_init.c | 25 +
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Should this patch be included in 2.0 as a bug fix? The rest of the
> series is probably better off in 2.1.
>
Yes, it should be, but I am not so clear how to do it.
Eric, Could you give me
On 03/26/2014 09:18 PM, arei.gong...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: ChenLiang
>
> The page may not be inserted into cache after executing save_xbzrle_page.
> In case of failure to insert, the original page should be sent rather
> than the page in the cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: ChenLiang
> Signed-off-
