On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 11/06/2013 19:18, Dusty Mabe ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> Did you manage to find anything?
>
> No, I was (and am :)) on vacation.
>
Paolo,
Hope you are enjoying your vacation. I have since deleted
Il 11/06/2013 19:18, Dusty Mabe ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> Please attach the QEMU command line too. I'll try to reproduce.
>>>
>>
>> The command line is below (sorry it's so large). A little cont
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> Please attach the QEMU command line too. I'll try to reproduce.
>>
>
> The command line is below (sorry it's so large). A little context: sda
> is a raw disk image backed by a file, whi
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Please attach the QEMU command line too. I'll try to reproduce.
>
The command line is below (sorry it's so large). A little context: sda
is a raw disk image backed by a file, while sdb is backed by a thin
logical volume in the host.
/usr/
Il 04/06/2013 03:02, Dusty Mabe ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> It is possible that I was mistaken. Now when I switch back to
>> cache=none I am still able to execute trim operations. I'll
>> investigate a little more into my exact steps that I took and see if
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> It is possible that I was mistaken. Now when I switch back to
> cache=none I am still able to execute trim operations. I'll
> investigate a little more into my exact steps that I took and see if I
> can come up with a reproducer for the issue I
Paolo,
It is possible that I was mistaken. Now when I switch back to
cache=none I am still able to execute trim operations. I'll
investigate a little more into my exact steps that I took and see if I
can come up with a reproducer for the issue I observed.
Thanks,
Dusty
Il 02/06/2013 22:21, Dusty Mabe ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Is it valid to have cache=none and discard=unmap together? I notice
> that when I have cache=none the fstrim operations inside of my guests
> gives me an error
What error? Can you add an extra disk and try
dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sdc bs=1
Hi,
Is it valid to have cache=none and discard=unmap together? I notice
that when I have cache=none the fstrim operations inside of my guests
gives me an error and i get this from the sys filesystem:
[root@guest ~]# cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/discard*
4096
0
0
This wasn't very obvious to me to be
