On 18/12/2015 17:28, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> Linux patches itself a lot, which
>> makes the memory savings minimal (if they exist at all). What is the
>> decompression time for a kernel that is compressed with LZO?
>
> It seems that you are perfectly correct here!
>
> With large pages enabled
On 12/15/2015 02:59 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 15/12/2015 12:27, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
The idea is that we could boot with the uncompressed Linux
kernel in the guest which serves 2 purposes:
- faster boot time as per Intel opinion
- memory savings
Uncompressed kernel image could be the same f
2015-12-15 19:27 GMT+08:00 Denis V. Lunev :
> Hello, Paolo!
>
> There is a plan or idea to improve current implementation
> of Clear Containers for QEMU. Patches about NVDIMM
> are floating in the list, you have proposed special
> boot firmware for a case.
>
> The idea is that we could boot with th
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 02:27:14PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> There is a plan or idea to improve current implementation
> of Clear Containers for QEMU. Patches about NVDIMM
> are floating in the list, you have proposed special
> boot firmware for a case.
By the way, Marc Mari is working on add
On 15/12/2015 12:27, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> The idea is that we could boot with the uncompressed Linux
> kernel in the guest which serves 2 purposes:
> - faster boot time as per Intel opinion
> - memory savings
>
> Uncompressed kernel image could be the same for several
> guests and thus memory
Hello, Paolo!
There is a plan or idea to improve current implementation
of Clear Containers for QEMU. Patches about NVDIMM
are floating in the list, you have proposed special
boot firmware for a case.
The idea is that we could boot with the uncompressed Linux
kernel in the guest which serves 2 p
