On 19 June 2015 at 08:17, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 19/06/15 17:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> If you make the minor fixes Peter C has suggested, rebase
>> them onto current master and resend with the relevant
>> reviewed-by: tags in the commit messages, I'll apply
>> them to master.
>
>
Hi Peter,
On 19/06/15 17:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 June 2015 at 06:00, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I see in the MAINTAINERS file that pretty much everything related
>> to the m68k architecture is listed as "Orphan".
>>
>> I have some patches that have been around for quite a while
Hi Peter,
On 19/06/15 15:53, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I see in the MAINTAINERS file that pretty much everything related
>> to the m68k architecture is listed as "Orphan".
>>
>> I have some patches that have been around for q
On 19 June 2015 at 06:00, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I see in the MAINTAINERS file that pretty much everything related
> to the m68k architecture is listed as "Orphan".
>
> I have some patches that have been around for quite a while (posted
> here twice) to fix some issues with the ColdFire
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I see in the MAINTAINERS file that pretty much everything related
> to the m68k architecture is listed as "Orphan".
>
> I have some patches that have been around for quite a while (posted
> here twice) to fix some issues with the
Hi All,
I see in the MAINTAINERS file that pretty much everything related
to the m68k architecture is listed as "Orphan".
I have some patches that have been around for quite a while (posted
here twice) to fix some issues with the ColdFire support.
[See https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-d
