andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 25/11/2007, Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see there are two instances of pflash_register() , one for
pflash_cfi01.c and the other in pflash_cfi02.c. In order to get the
proper one, I assume we use link order?
No, ofcourse we will need to rename one of
On 25/11/2007, Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see there are two instances of pflash_register() , one for
> pflash_cfi01.c and the other in pflash_cfi02.c. In order to get the
> proper one, I assume we use link order?
No, ofcourse we will need to rename one of them. To be honest, I
missed the
Hello,
I see there are two instances of pflash_register() , one for
pflash_cfi01.c and the other in pflash_cfi02.c. In order to get the
proper one, I assume we use link order?
- Armin
