On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/03/2012 10:06 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2012 12:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-07-02 11:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches fo
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:24:45PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/04/2012 01:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:43:48PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 07/02/2012 12:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> > On 2012-07-02 11:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> >> I've been thin
On 07/04/2012 01:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:43:48PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 07/02/2012 12:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> > On 2012-07-02 11:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >> I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches for device
>> >> assignment. Basically w
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:43:48PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/02/2012 12:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2012-07-02 11:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches for device
> >> assignment. Basically while I thought it makes sense
> >> to make all devices:
On 07/03/2012 10:06 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 07/02/2012 12:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-07-02 11:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches for device
assignment. Basically while I thought it ma
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/02/2012 12:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-07-02 11:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches for device
>>> assignment. Basically while I thought it makes sense
>>> to make all devices: assignment an
On 07/02/2012 12:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-07-02 11:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches for device
>> assignment. Basically while I thought it makes sense
>> to make all devices: assignment and not - behave the
>> same and use same APIs for injectin
On 2012-07-02 11:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches for device
> assignment. Basically while I thought it makes sense
> to make all devices: assignment and not - behave the
> same and use same APIs for injecting irqs, Anthony thinks there is huge
> value in
On 07/02/2012 12:18 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches for device
> assignment. Basically while I thought it makes sense
> to make all devices: assignment and not - behave the
> same and use same APIs for injecting irqs, Anthony thinks there is huge
> value
I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches for device
assignment. Basically while I thought it makes sense
to make all devices: assignment and not - behave the
same and use same APIs for injecting irqs, Anthony thinks there is huge
value in making irq propagation hierarchical and device assignment
10 matches
Mail list logo