On 2012-10-04 19:21, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 09:27 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-10-04 14:10, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
>>> On 10/04/2012 07:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-10-03 15:19, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/10/2012 12:57, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues h
On 10/04/2012 09:27 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-10-04 14:10, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
On 10/04/2012 07:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-10-03 15:19, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/10/2012 12:57, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues ha scritto:
Yep, I did send patches with the testdev device present
On 2012-10-04 14:10, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 07:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-10-03 15:19, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 03/10/2012 12:57, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues ha scritto:
Yep, I did send patches with the testdev device present on qemu-kvm.git
to qemu.git a
On 10/04/2012 07:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-10-03 15:19, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/10/2012 12:57, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues ha scritto:
Yep, I did send patches with the testdev device present on qemu-kvm.git
to qemu.git a while ago, but there were many comments on the review, I
ended up n
On 2012-10-03 15:19, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/10/2012 12:57, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues ha scritto:
>> Yep, I did send patches with the testdev device present on qemu-kvm.git
>> to qemu.git a while ago, but there were many comments on the review, I
>> ended up not implementing everything that was
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:19:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/10/2012 12:57, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues ha scritto:
> > Yep, I did send patches with the testdev device present on qemu-kvm.git
> > to qemu.git a while ago, but there were many comments on the review, I
> > ended up not implemen
Il 03/10/2012 12:57, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues ha scritto:
> Yep, I did send patches with the testdev device present on qemu-kvm.git
> to qemu.git a while ago, but there were many comments on the review, I
> ended up not implementing everything that was asked and the patches were
> archived.
>
> If
On 10/03/2012 06:55 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:26:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-10-01 15:19, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Jan Kiszka writes:
On 2012-10-01 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
It's not just about default configs. We need to validate if the
migration format
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 12:06:57PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-10-03 11:55, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:26:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-10-01 15:19, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>> Jan Kiszka writes:
> >>>
> On 2012-10-01 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On 2012-10-03 11:55, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:26:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-10-01 15:19, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Jan Kiszka writes:
>>>
On 2012-10-01 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
It's not just about default configs. We need to validate if th
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:26:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-10-01 15:19, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka writes:
> >
> >> On 2012-10-01 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>
> >> It's not just about default configs. We need to validate if the
> >> migration formats are truly compatib
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:19:29AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jan Kiszka writes:
> I think at this point, none of this matters but I added the various
> distro maintainers to the thread.
>
> I think it's time for the distros to drop qemu-kvm and just ship
> qemu.git. Is there anything else
Quoting Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org):
> On 1 October 2012 15:15, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > We (Ubuntu) plan to switch to qemu in the next release which opens in
> > November. I suppose there's likely to be a hiccough or two, but I can't
> > think of any offhand.
>
> Are you planning to
>>> On 10/1/2012 at 07:19 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jan Kiszka writes:
>
>> On 2012-10-01 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>> It's not just about default configs. We need to validate if the
>> migration formats are truly compatible (qemu-kvm -> QEMU, the other way
>> around definitely not).
On 1 October 2012 15:15, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> We (Ubuntu) plan to switch to qemu in the next release which opens in
> November. I suppose there's likely to be a hiccough or two, but I can't
> think of any offhand.
Are you planning to do that for all CPU target architectures, or
to maintain the
Il 01/10/2012 16:07, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
>>> -drive ...,boot= <- this is ignored
>
> It's ignored, but useful for certain things. I don't know how many of
> our users use boot= today, but it's certainly still in the code, and
> supported. I honestly wouldn't mind to carry a SUSE specific pa
We (Ubuntu) plan to switch to qemu in the next release which opens in
November. I suppose there's likely to be a hiccough or two, but I can't
think of any offhand.
-serge
Quoting Scott Moser (smo...@ubuntu.com):
> you should have been added here.
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
>
On 01.10.2012, at 15:19, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jan Kiszka writes:
>
>> On 2012-10-01 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>> It's not just about default configs. We need to validate if the
>> migration formats are truly compatible (qemu-kvm -> QEMU, the other way
>> around definitely not). For
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 01/10/2012 15:19, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> I think it's time for the distros to drop qemu-kvm and just ship
>> qemu.git. Is there anything else that needs to happen to make that
>> switch?
>
> Perhaps change the default to -machine accel=kvm:tcg?
>
> Paolo
I wou
On 2012-10-01 15:44, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 01.10.2012 17:36, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-10-01 15:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
Default nic is rtl8139 vs. e1000.
>>>
>>> Config file (as suggested earlier on this thread).
>>
>> If you need to append -config bla, you can also specify the des
On 2012-10-01 15:38, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 01/10/2012 15:19, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> I think it's time for the distros to drop qemu-kvm and just ship
>> qemu.git. Is there anything else that needs to happen to make that
>> switch?
>
> Perhaps change the default to -machine accel=kvm:tc
01.10.2012 17:36, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-10-01 15:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> Default nic is rtl8139 vs. e1000.
>>
>> Config file (as suggested earlier on this thread).
>
> If you need to append -config bla, you can also specify the desired NIC
> explicitly - I see no value in the former.
Il 01/10/2012 15:19, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> I think it's time for the distros to drop qemu-kvm and just ship
> qemu.git. Is there anything else that needs to happen to make that
> switch?
Perhaps change the default to -machine accel=kvm:tcg?
Paolo
On 2012-10-01 15:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:19:29AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka writes:
>>
>>> On 2012-10-01 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>
>>> It's not just about default configs. We need to validate if the
>>> migration formats are truly compatible
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:19:29AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jan Kiszka writes:
>
> > On 2012-10-01 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > It's not just about default configs. We need to validate if the
> > migration formats are truly compatible (qemu-kvm -> QEMU, the other way
> > around de
On 2012-10-01 15:19, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jan Kiszka writes:
>
>> On 2012-10-01 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>> It's not just about default configs. We need to validate if the
>> migration formats are truly compatible (qemu-kvm -> QEMU, the other way
>> around definitely not). For the com
Jan Kiszka writes:
> On 2012-10-01 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> It's not just about default configs. We need to validate if the
> migration formats are truly compatible (qemu-kvm -> QEMU, the other way
> around definitely not). For the command line switches, we could provide
> a wrapper scri
27 matches
Mail list logo
