On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:08:26AM +0200, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> >> I don't have any problems running a statically linked x86_64
> >> helloworld program in an i386 chroot. Dynamically linked programs try
> >> to use wrong libraries, but at lea
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> I don't have any problems running a statically linked x86_64
>> helloworld program in an i386 chroot. Dynamically linked programs try
>> to use wrong libraries, but at least running
>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 directly works.
>
> static b
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 05:27, Andi Kleen wrote:
> static binary segfaults too. I wonder if it's some setup on my system.
>
> I tried disabling the usual suspects like address randomization, but that
> didn't change things.
> Or could it be the compiler (gcc 4.5)?
>
> I remember using this quite s
I don't have any problems running a statically linked x86_64
helloworld program in an i386 chroot. Dynamically linked programs try
to use wrong libraries, but at least running
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 directly works.
static binary segfaults too. I wonder if it's some setup on my system.
I
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the linux-user qemu for x86-64/i386 supposed to work?
>
> For example running it with a simple hello world on FC14 in gdb:
>
> /home/ak/tsrc/hello: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),
> dynamically linked (uses share
Hi,
Is the linux-user qemu for x86-64/i386 supposed to work?
For example running it with a simple hello world on FC14 in gdb:
/home/ak/tsrc/hello: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),
dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, not stripped
[Thread debugging us
