On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 02:06:53PM -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> VmWare seems to let you do it any way you want. Full screen, scroll it
> manually or auto scroll, etc. So clearly it can be done. Maybe the code
> in something like VNC client would give some ideas.
>
Scrolling manually works, j
VmWare seems to let you do it any way you want. Full screen, scroll it
manually or auto scroll, etc. So clearly it can be done. Maybe the code
in something like VNC client would give some ideas.
Scaling an image *down* to fit in window of a given size seems totally
pointless other than to give a t
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 02:53:23PM -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 08:37:18PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > > That works too. So Herbert, tell us how does one set up a virtual screen
> > > a la X Server style when one is using Windows? Presumably there is some
> > > "powerto
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 01:21:23PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Jim C. Brown"
>
>
> >> Or the same size. Don't forget, Windows XP will cover up part of the
> >> window
> >> even when the GTK version switches to 'full screen'.
> >
> > This is easily worked around by activiating the auto-hid
On Sunday, July 10, 2005, 19:57:57, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> That works too. So Herbert, tell us how does one set up a virtual screen
> a la X Server style when one is using Windows? Presumably there is some
> "powertoy" out there which does this, but I don't know of any myself.
Windows 9x (and pres
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 01:57:57PM -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 07:32:01PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > > Some, such as myself, still use 800x600. I do it out of necessity. I
> > > have
> > > poor eyesight and don't have the spare cash (or desk space!) for a 21
> >
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 08:37:18PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > That works too. So Herbert, tell us how does one set up a virtual screen
> > a la X Server style when one is using Windows? Presumably there is some
> > "powertoy" out there which does this, but I don't know of any myself.
>
> wel
"Herbert Poetzl"
>> Some, such as myself, still use 800x600. I do it out of necessity. I
>> have
>> poor eyesight and don't have the spare cash (or desk space!) for a 21
>> inch
>> monitor. And LCD monitors tend to have too high a native resolution.
>> With
>> my current 17" monitor, I simply c
"Jim C. Brown"
>> Or the same size. Don't forget, Windows XP will cover up part of the
>> window
>> even when the GTK version switches to 'full screen'.
>
> This is easily worked around by activiating the auto-hide feature of the
> taskbar.
Kludge.
You should *never* have to modify your host f
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 07:32:01PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > Some, such as myself, still use 800x600. I do it out of necessity. I have
> > poor eyesight and don't have the spare cash (or desk space!) for a 21 inch
> > monitor. And LCD monitors tend to have too high a native resolution.
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:37:07AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Jim C. Brown"
>
>
> >I personally feel that a scrollable window is not very useful unless your
> >host
> > resolution is smaller than your guest resolution. Hard to see what the
> > point is
>
> Or the same size. Don't forg
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:37:07AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Jim C. Brown"
>
>
> >I personally feel that a scrollable window is not very useful unless your
> >host
> > resolution is smaller than your guest resolution. Hard to see what the
> > point is
>
> Or the same size. Don't forg
"Jim C. Brown"
>I personally feel that a scrollable window is not very useful unless your
>host
> resolution is smaller than your guest resolution. Hard to see what the
> point is
Or the same size. Don't forget, Windows XP will cover up part of the window
even when the GTK version switches t
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 08:27:14AM -0700, user user wrote:
> Why not make a Win32 GUI version?
>
Keep in mind that I'm primarily a Linux/GNU/Xlib coder.
>From what Fabrice Bellard has told me, a native Win32 GUI is the eventual plan,
and he considers GTK version for Linux/X11 only.
He also said
Why not make a Win32 GUI version?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.n
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 04:37:45PM +0530, Ashish Naik wrote:
> I am using Q to run Qemu which has good feature like saving the state so
> that I don't have to reboot again which takes time.
>
plain qemu has that.
Anyways, I just like to point out that I have never tested GTK with OS X, nor
have
s and Regards,
Ashish Naik
> From: Ashish Naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To:
> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:20:56 +0530
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] scrollable window
>
> HI,
>
> I am a user of Qemu trying to run Windows 2000 on my G4 Powerbook. I am not
> ve
guest resolution.
I think the qemu window should open with 80% of available screen size. Is
that difficult to achieve?
Thanks and Regards,
Ashish Naik
> From: "Jim C. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To:
> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:58:35 -0400
> To:
> Subject: [
I personally feel that a scrollable window is not very useful unless your host
resolution is smaller than your guest resolution. Hard to see what the point is
really... especially if you want to use full screens and mouse pointer
grabbing. Besides, it just looks ugly. I feel the conventional qemu w
19 matches
Mail list logo
