On 2012-02-14 09:22, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:35:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-02-13 16:27, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> I'm inclined to suggest a slirp rewrite (base support, not all features
>> at once) as a GSOC project. QEMU really deserves something better.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:35:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-02-13 16:27, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> I'm inclined to suggest a slirp rewrite (base support, not all features
> at once) as a GSOC project. QEMU really deserves something better.
A talented student could pull it off, especially if i
On 2012-02-13 21:43, Alex Bradbury wrote:
> On 13 February 2012 19:35, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> I'm inclined to suggest a slirp rewrite (base support, not all features
>> at once) as a GSOC project. QEMU really deserves something better.
>
> Would it be feasible to adopt uip from kvm tool instead?
>
On 13 February 2012 19:35, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> I'm inclined to suggest a slirp rewrite (base support, not all features
> at once) as a GSOC project. QEMU really deserves something better.
Would it be feasible to adopt uip from kvm tool instead?
https://github.com/penberg/linux-kvm/tree/master/to
On 2012-02-13 20:35, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-02-13 16:27, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-02-12 19:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
It seems somewhat easy to crash qemu with slirp if we queue multiple
packets.
I didn't investiga
On 2012-02-13 16:27, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-02-12 19:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> It seems somewhat easy to crash qemu with slirp if we queue multiple
>>> packets.
>>> I didn't investigate further yet so I don't know if this
>>> is
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-02-12 19:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> It seems somewhat easy to crash qemu with slirp if we queue multiple packets.
>> I didn't investigate further yet so I don't know if this
>> is a regression. Anyone knowledgeable about slirp want
On 2012-02-12 19:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> It seems somewhat easy to crash qemu with slirp if we queue multiple packets.
> I didn't investigate further yet so I don't know if this
> is a regression. Anyone knowledgeable about slirp wants to take a look?
>
> /home/mst/qemu-test/bin/qemu-syste
It seems somewhat easy to crash qemu with slirp if we queue multiple packets.
I didn't investigate further yet so I don't know if this
is a regression. Anyone knowledgeable about slirp wants to take a look?
/home/mst/qemu-test/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -m 1G -drive
file=/home/mst/rhel6.q
