On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:38:08PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Have you tested if your patch actually blocks savevm?
Yes, with -smp 2.
Can you please include the savevm.c patch in your queue?
TIA.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 06:32:42PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 04:21:59PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 06:04:45PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >
> > > Invariant TSC documentation mentions that "invariant TSC will run at a
> > > constant
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 04:21:59PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 06:04:45PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > Invariant TSC documentation mentions that "invariant TSC will run at a
> > constant rate in all ACPI P-, C-. and T-states".
> >
> > This is not the case if m
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 06:04:45PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Invariant TSC documentation mentions that "invariant TSC will run at a
> constant rate in all ACPI P-, C-. and T-states".
>
> This is not the case if migration to a host with different TSC frequency
> is allowed, or if savevm i
Invariant TSC documentation mentions that "invariant TSC will run at a
constant rate in all ACPI P-, C-. and T-states".
This is not the case if migration to a host with different TSC frequency
is allowed, or if savevm is performed. So block migration/savevm.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti
Ind
