On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kova
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Igor Kovalenko
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Igor Kovalenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Laurent Desnogues
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Igor Kovalenko
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno
w
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Igor Kovalenko
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kova
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Laurent Desnogue
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Laurent Desnogues
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Igor Kova
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Igor Kovalenko
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Laurent Des
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Laurent Desnogues
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Igor Kovalenko
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Lauren
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Igor Kovalenko
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Laurent Desnogues
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Igor Kovale
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Laurent Desnogues
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Igor Kovalenko
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Lauren
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Laurent Desnogues
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Igor Kovalenko
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Laurent Desnogues
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Laurent Desnogues
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Igor Kovalenko
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Laurent Desnogues
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Igor Koval
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Igor Kovalenko
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Laurent Desnogues
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Igor Kovalenko
>>> wrote:
>> Do you have public test case?
>> It is p
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Laurent Desnogues
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Igor Kovalenko
>> wrote:
> Do you have public test case?
> It is possible to code this delay slot write test but real issue may
> b
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Igor Kovalenko
> wrote:
Do you have public test case?
It is possible to code this delay slot write test but real issue may
be corruption elsewhere.
>
> The test case is trivial: it's just th
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Igor Kovalenko
wrote:
>>> Do you have public test case?
>>> It is possible to code this delay slot write test but real issue may
>>> be corruption elsewhere.
The test case is trivial: it's just the two instructions, branch and wrpr.
> In theory there could be mul
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Igor Kovalenko
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Artyom Tarasenko
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Igor Kovalenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Igor Kovale
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>
> Can do it, but I'd like to understand first what we are looking for.
> How does the main works in this case? Is it something like following?
>
> translate {brz,pn ; wrpr} -> optimize -> execute ->translate {retl ;
> ...} ->optimize -> ex
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Igor Kovalenko
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Igor Kovalenko
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Artyom Tara
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Igor Kovalenko
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Igor Kovalenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Blue Swirl
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Igor Kovalenko
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
wro
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Aurelien Jarno
wrote
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Aurelien Jarno
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Artyom Tar
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
Trying to boot some proprietary OS I get qemu-system-
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 April 2011 15:09, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> Does it mean the last block is processed correctly and the crash
>> happens on the next instruction which doesn't make it to the log?
>
> ...maybe tcg_abort() should do a qemu_log_flush()...
On 10 April 2011 15:09, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> Does it mean the last block is processed correctly and the crash
> happens on the next instruction which doesn't make it to the log?
...maybe tcg_abort() should do a qemu_log_flush()...?
-- PMM
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>>> Trying to boot some proprietary OS I get qemu-system-sparc64 crash with a
>>>
>>> tcg/tcg.c:1892: tcg fatal er
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> Trying to boot some proprietary OS I get qemu-system-sparc64 crash with a
>>
>> tcg/tcg.c:1892: tcg fatal error
>>
>> error message.
>>
>> It looks like it can be a platfor
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> Trying to boot some proprietary OS I get qemu-system-sparc64 crash with a
>
> tcg/tcg.c:1892: tcg fatal error
>
> error message.
>
> It looks like it can be a platform independent bug though, because
> when a '-singlestep' optio
Trying to boot some proprietary OS I get qemu-system-sparc64 crash with a
tcg/tcg.c:1892: tcg fatal error
error message.
It looks like it can be a platform independent bug though, because
when a '-singlestep' option IS present, qemu doesn't crash and seems
to translate the code properly.
(gdb)
32 matches
Mail list logo