On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Sorry for the slow reply, I missed this one until now. Adding block
> maintainers.
>
> John Snow writes:
>
>> On 11/02/2014 02:21 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> All "modern" 2-way drive/device specifications need to explicitly
>>> spec
Sorry for the slow reply, I missed this one until now. Adding block
maintainers.
John Snow writes:
> On 11/02/2014 02:21 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> All "modern" 2-way drive/device specifications need to explicitly
>> specify if=none for the drive for it to not be used in the default
>> ide b
On 11/02/2014 02:21 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
All "modern" 2-way drive/device specifications need to explicitly
specify if=none for the drive for it to not be used in the default
ide bus implicitly.
Which behave like this? I am reasonably sheltered in the IDE and S/ATA
lands.
But how abo
All "modern" 2-way drive/device specifications need to explicitly
specify if=none for the drive for it to not be used in the default
ide bus implicitly.
But how about using some if=unspecified implicitly for all devices
which don't specify if=, pick any devices from that list which are
referenced