Re: [Qemu-devel] the need for if=none for -drive?

2015-01-08 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Sorry for the slow reply, I missed this one until now. Adding block > maintainers. > > John Snow writes: > >> On 11/02/2014 02:21 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>> All "modern" 2-way drive/device specifications need to explicitly >>> spec

Re: [Qemu-devel] the need for if=none for -drive?

2014-12-17 Thread Markus Armbruster
Sorry for the slow reply, I missed this one until now. Adding block maintainers. John Snow writes: > On 11/02/2014 02:21 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> All "modern" 2-way drive/device specifications need to explicitly >> specify if=none for the drive for it to not be used in the default >> ide b

Re: [Qemu-devel] the need for if=none for -drive?

2014-11-03 Thread John Snow
On 11/02/2014 02:21 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: All "modern" 2-way drive/device specifications need to explicitly specify if=none for the drive for it to not be used in the default ide bus implicitly. Which behave like this? I am reasonably sheltered in the IDE and S/ATA lands. But how abo

[Qemu-devel] the need for if=none for -drive?

2014-11-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
All "modern" 2-way drive/device specifications need to explicitly specify if=none for the drive for it to not be used in the default ide bus implicitly. But how about using some if=unspecified implicitly for all devices which don't specify if=, pick any devices from that list which are referenced