Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
Hello,
There seems to be an issue with guest Windows 98 SE on qemu 0.8.1 and kqemu
1.3.0pre7, on a Linux host.
Windows 98 SE is visibly very slow; and when qemu is run with -no-kqemu, it is
actually faster.
I have this issue on two different systems:
- Intel Celer
В сообщении от 14 мая 2006 16:45 Brad Campbell написал(a):
> Do you have the idle driver loaded in win98 as per the qemu docs?
> Otherwise it will use 100% cpu, where as NT based systems know how to hlt
> the processor
Thanks, I have done so now.
The situation has improved, the speed with kqemu
Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
I wrote:
There seems to be an issue with guest Windows 98 SE on qemu 0.8.1 and kqemu
1.3.0pre7, on a Linux host.
Windows 98 SE is visibly very slow; and when qemu is run with -no-kqemu, it
is actually faster.
I forgot to mention that the CPU use as per "top" is consta
I wrote:
> There seems to be an issue with guest Windows 98 SE on qemu 0.8.1 and kqemu
> 1.3.0pre7, on a Linux host.
>
> Windows 98 SE is visibly very slow; and when qemu is run with -no-kqemu, it
> is actually faster.
I forgot to mention that the CPU use as per "top" is constantly at 100%,
alm
Hello,
There seems to be an issue with guest Windows 98 SE on qemu 0.8.1 and kqemu
1.3.0pre7, on a Linux host.
Windows 98 SE is visibly very slow; and when qemu is run with -no-kqemu, it is
actually faster.
I have this issue on two different systems:
- Intel Celeron 2400 CPU, 512M RAM, RH9-d
