...also make sure that you have installed the CPU usage reduction fix
for Windows 98, se manual: 3.11.2.2
(The link in the manual seems to be dead, but working ones can be found
using Google.)
/Dan
Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 12:54, Dan Sandberg wrote:
On the oth
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 12:54, Dan Sandberg wrote:
> On the other hand, if for instance VMware is able to run Windows 98 much
> faster (I do not have it so I can't test this) then my guess is that
> kqemu is the guilty part and does something wrong with 16-bit code.
Thanks. Will test with VMWa
I have noticed the same thing.
Could it be that todays processors are simply very bad at running 16-bit
code (that the pipeline has to be reloaded for each instruction or
something similar)?
If this is the case there is probably nothing else to do than avoiding
kqemu with 16-bit OS:s.
On the
Hello,
Some time ago I reported win98 slowness with kqemu, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-05/msg00295.html
I have tried again, this time on a Pentium 4 (Prescott) 3 GHz system, with
Debian sarge and backports.org 2.6.18 kernel; qemu 0.8.2 and kqemu 1.3.0pre9
are locally
