On 7/21/21 12:47 PM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> On 7/21/21 12:35 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Open question to all,
>>>
>>> why don't we have/add the ability to configure
>>>
>>> CONFIG_XXX=m
>>>
>>> for all potentially modular pieces?
>>>
>>> It should be possible to say, I want to build
On 7/21/21 12:35 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Open question to all,
>>
>> why don't we have/add the ability to configure
>>
>> CONFIG_XXX=m
>>
>> for all potentially modular pieces?
>>
>> It should be possible to say, I want to build the storage plugins as
>> modules, TCG I would like it
Hi,
> Open question to all,
>
> why don't we have/add the ability to configure
>
> CONFIG_XXX=m
>
> for all potentially modular pieces?
>
> It should be possible to say, I want to build the storage plugins as modules,
> TCG I would like it built-in, and KVM as a module,
> or any combination
On 7/1/21 1:27 AM, Jose R. Ziviani wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm sending this as RFC because it's based on a patch still on
> review[1], so I'd like to see if it makes sense.
>
> Tt will improve the error message when an accelerator module could
> not be loaded. Instead of the current assert error, a f
Hello!
I'm sending this as RFC because it's based on a patch still on
review[1], so I'd like to see if it makes sense.
Tt will improve the error message when an accelerator module could
not be loaded. Instead of the current assert error, a formated
message will be displayed.
[1] https://patchwor
