subject:"\[RFC 2\/8\] numa\: call \->ram_block_removed\(\) in ram_block_notifer_remove\(\)"

Re: [RFC 2/8] numa: call ->ram_block_removed() in ram_block_notifer_remove()

2022-03-30 Thread David Hildenbrand

On 23.03.22 12:17, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > When a RAMBlockNotifier is added, ->ram_block_added() is called with all > existing RAMBlocks. There is no equivalent ->ram_block_removed() call > when a RAMBlockNotifier is removed. > > The util/vfio-helpers.c code (the sole user of RAMBlockNotifier) is

[RFC 2/8] numa: call ->ram_block_removed() in ram_block_notifer_remove()

2022-03-23 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi

When a RAMBlockNotifier is added, ->ram_block_added() is called with all existing RAMBlocks. There is no equivalent ->ram_block_removed() call when a RAMBlockNotifier is removed. The util/vfio-helpers.c code (the sole user of RAMBlockNotifier) is fine with this asymmetry because it does not rely o