Markus Armbruster writes:
> Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
>
>> On 12/10/2022 13:11, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> This is an attempt to improve our processes documentation by:
>>> - adding an explicit section on maintainers
>>> - reducing the up-front verbiage in patch submission
>>> -
Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
> On 12/10/2022 13:11, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> This is an attempt to improve our processes documentation by:
>> - adding an explicit section on maintainers
>> - reducing the up-front verbiage in patch submission
>> - emphasising the importance to respectful
On 12/10/2022 13:11, Alex Bennée wrote:
Hi,
This is an attempt to improve our processes documentation by:
- adding an explicit section on maintainers
- reducing the up-front verbiage in patch submission
- emphasising the importance to respectful reviews
I'm sure the language could be
On 10/12/22 14:11, Alex Bennée wrote:
Hi,
This is an attempt to improve our processes documentation by:
- adding an explicit section on maintainers
- reducing the up-front verbiage in patch submission
- emphasising the importance to respectful reviews
I'm sure the language could be
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 01:11:48PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is an attempt to improve our processes documentation by:
>
> - adding an explicit section on maintainers
> - reducing the up-front verbiage in patch submission
> - emphasising the importance to respectful reviews
>
>
Hi,
This is an attempt to improve our processes documentation by:
- adding an explicit section on maintainers
- reducing the up-front verbiage in patch submission
- emphasising the importance to respectful reviews
I'm sure the language could be improved further so I humbly submit
this RFC
