On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:14:23PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 14/05/21 15:13, Mirela Grujic wrote:
> > However, if you believe it should rather be just renamed I can do so.
>
> I am just not sure it's such an advantage to replace phase_check with
> separate functions. The rename is a
On 14/05/21 15:13, Mirela Grujic wrote:
However, if you believe it should rather be just renamed I can do so.
I am just not sure it's such an advantage to replace phase_check with
separate functions. The rename is a constraint of QAPI, so we have to
live with the long names.
Paolo
On 5/13/21 7:46 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 13/05/21 10:25, Mirela Grujic wrote:
Once we define MachineInitPhase in qapi, the generated enumeration
constants will be prefixed with the MACHINE_INIT_PHASE_.
We need to define the MachineInitPhase enum in qapi in order to
add the QMP command that
On 13/05/21 10:25, Mirela Grujic wrote:
Once we define MachineInitPhase in qapi, the generated enumeration
constants will be prefixed with the MACHINE_INIT_PHASE_.
We need to define the MachineInitPhase enum in qapi in order to
add the QMP command that will query current machine init phase.
Once we define MachineInitPhase in qapi, the generated enumeration
constants will be prefixed with the MACHINE_INIT_PHASE_.
We need to define the MachineInitPhase enum in qapi in order to
add the QMP command that will query current machine init phase.
Since in the existing definition of enum
