On 9/16/22 17:28, Alex Bennée wrote:
I pondered boolean but wasn't sure if that would blow up the size of
MemTxAttrs so went for the bitfield.
You can use bool with a bitfield. Though Phil's suggestion of .requestor_type has merit.
That depends on what comes of Peter's hw modeling
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
> On 15/9/22 10:16, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 9/14/22 17:09, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> Now that MxTxAttrs encodes a CPU we should use that to figure it out.
>>> This solves edge cases like accessing via gdbstub or qtest.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
>>>
On 15/9/22 10:16, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 9/14/22 17:09, Alex Bennée wrote:
Now that MxTxAttrs encodes a CPU we should use that to figure it out.
This solves edge cases like accessing via gdbstub or qtest.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
Resolves:
On 9/14/22 17:09, Alex Bennée wrote:
Now that MxTxAttrs encodes a CPU we should use that to figure it out.
This solves edge cases like accessing via gdbstub or qtest.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/124
---
hw/intc/arm_gic.c | 39
Now that MxTxAttrs encodes a CPU we should use that to figure it out.
This solves edge cases like accessing via gdbstub or qtest.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/124
---
hw/intc/arm_gic.c | 39 ++-
1 file
