On 2021/7/12 23:27, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:05:43PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:04:04PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 06:07:36PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
It's possible that dies parameter is explicitly specified as "dies=0"
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:05:43PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:04:04PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 06:07:36PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> > > It's possible that dies parameter is explicitly specified as "dies=0"
> > > in the cmdline, if so we wi
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:04:04PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 06:07:36PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> > It's possible that dies parameter is explicitly specified as "dies=0"
> > in the cmdline, if so we will wrongly calculate the other ommited
> > parameters such as "sockets
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 06:07:36PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> It's possible that dies parameter is explicitly specified as "dies=0"
> in the cmdline, if so we will wrongly calculate the other ommited
> parameters such as "sockets = maxcpus / (dies * cores * threads);"
> with a zeroed dies value.
>
It's possible that dies parameter is explicitly specified as "dies=0"
in the cmdline, if so we will wrongly calculate the other ommited
parameters such as "sockets = maxcpus / (dies * cores * threads);"
with a zeroed dies value.
So perform zero-check (default the value to 1 if zeroed) for -smp die
