On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:43:19PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:27:54PM +0800, Ying Fang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/9/2020 6:45 PM, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > > Hi Fangying,
> > > A trivial thing. This patch looks bit of a noise in this patch-set. Better
> > > to send it as a
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:27:54PM +0800, Ying Fang wrote:
>
>
> On 11/9/2020 6:45 PM, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > Hi Fangying,
> > A trivial thing. This patch looks bit of a noise in this patch-set. Better
> > to send it as a separate patch-set and get it accepted.
> >
> Hmm, this patch looks like a
: [RFC PATCH v3 01/13] hw/arm/virt: Spell out smp.cpus and smp.max_cpus
From: Andrew Jones
Prefer to spell out the smp.cpus and smp.max_cpus machine state
variables in order to make grepping easier and to avoid any
confusion as to what cpu count is being used where.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones
nu.org; drjo...@redhat.com;
> imamm...@redhat.com; shannon.zha...@gmail.com; alistair.fran...@wdc.com;
> Zhanghailiang ; Salil Mehta
>
> Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 01/13] hw/arm/virt: Spell out smp.cpus and smp.max_cpus
>
> From: Andrew Jones
>
> Prefer to spell out the smp
From: Andrew Jones
Prefer to spell out the smp.cpus and smp.max_cpus machine state
variables in order to make grepping easier and to avoid any
confusion as to what cpu count is being used where.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones
---
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 8 +++
hw/arm/virt.c| 5
