Hi David,
Sorry about the delay.
On 2/8/21 11:51 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:40:31PM +0530, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
Thanks for the comments!
On 12/28/20 2:08 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 01:08:53PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
...
The overall idea l
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:40:31PM +0530, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> Thanks for the comments!
>
>
> On 12/28/20 2:08 PM, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 01:08:53PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> ...
> > > The overall idea looks good but I think you should consider using
> > > a thr
Thanks for the comments!
On 12/28/20 2:08 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 01:08:53PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
...
The overall idea looks good but I think you should consider using
a thread pool to implement it. See below.
I am not convinced, however. Specifically, attaching
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 01:08:53PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Hi Shiva,
>
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:16:39 -0600
> Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
>
> > The patch adds support for async hcalls at the DRC level for the
> > spapr devices. To be used by spapr-scm devices in the patch/es to follow.
> >
> >
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:08:53 +0100
Greg Kurz wrote:
> Hi Shiva,
>
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:16:39 -0600
> Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
>
> > The patch adds support for async hcalls at the DRC level for the
> > spapr devices. To be used by spapr-scm devices in the patch/es to follow.
> >
> > Signe
Hi Shiva,
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:16:39 -0600
Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> The patch adds support for async hcalls at the DRC level for the
> spapr devices. To be used by spapr-scm devices in the patch/es to follow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat
> ---
The overall idea looks good but I t
The patch adds support for async hcalls at the DRC level for the
spapr devices. To be used by spapr-scm devices in the patch/es to follow.
Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat
---
hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c | 149
include/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.h | 25 +
