Hi Markus and Daniel,
(I replied to both of you because I discussed the idea of cache object
at the end)
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 10:32:14 +0100
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/7]
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 10:54:51AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Zhao Liu writes:
>
> > Add "l1d-cache", "l1i-cache". "l2-cache", and "l3-cache" options in
> > -smp to define the cache topology for SMP system.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/qapi/machine.json
Zhao Liu writes:
> Add "l1d-cache", "l1i-cache". "l2-cache", and "l3-cache" options in
> -smp to define the cache topology for SMP system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu
[...]
> diff --git a/qapi/machine.json b/qapi/machine.json
> index 7ac5a05bb9c9..8fa5af69b1bf 100644
> --- a/qapi/machine.json
Add "l1d-cache", "l1i-cache". "l2-cache", and "l3-cache" options in
-smp to define the cache topology for SMP system.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu
---
Changes since RFC v1:
* Set has_*_cache field in machine_get_smp(). (JeeHeng)
* Adjust string breaking style in error_setg() for more semantic
