On 6/28/24 9:01 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
These ACMD names weren't really useful, "UNKNOWN_ACMD" is simpler.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>


Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>

Thanks,

C.


---
  hw/sd/sd.c | 12 +-----------
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
index 7f93d363c7..19322c558f 100644
--- a/hw/sd/sd.c
+++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
@@ -259,23 +259,13 @@ static const char *sd_cmd_name(SDState *sd, uint8_t cmd)
static const char *sd_acmd_name(SDState *sd, uint8_t cmd)
  {
-    static const char *acmd_abbrev[SDMMC_CMD_MAX] = {
-        [14] = "DPS_spec",                  [15] = "DPS_spec",
-        [16] = "DPS_spec",
-        [18] = "SECU_spec",
-        [52] = "SECU_spec",                 [53] = "SECU_spec",
-        [54] = "SECU_spec",
-        [56] = "SECU_spec",                 [57] = "SECU_spec",
-        [58] = "SECU_spec",                 [59] = "SECU_spec",
-    };
      const SDProto *sdp = sd->proto;
if (sdp->acmd[cmd].handler) {
-        assert(!acmd_abbrev[cmd]);
          return sdp->acmd[cmd].name;
      }
- return acmd_abbrev[cmd] ? acmd_abbrev[cmd] : "UNKNOWN_ACMD";
+    return "UNKNOWN_ACMD";
  }
static uint8_t sd_get_dat_lines(SDState *sd)


Reply via email to