On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:44:48AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 12:04:24PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > -if (CPUPhysBits) {
> > -u64 top = 1LL << CPUPhysBits;
> > +if (pci_phys_bits) {
>
> FYI, this is a change in behavior - previously this
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 12:04:24PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This only changes the placement of the PCI bars. The pci setup code is
> > the only consumer of that variable, guess it makes sense to move the
> > quirk to the pci code (as suggested by Kevin) to clarify this.
>
>
Hi,
> This only changes the placement of the PCI bars. The pci setup code is
> the only consumer of that variable, guess it makes sense to move the
> quirk to the pci code (as suggested by Kevin) to clarify this.
i.e. like this:
>From d538dc7d4316e557ae302464252444d09de0681d Mon Sep 17
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 09:36:02AM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> On 11/8/23 19:35, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:03:09PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> For better compatibility with old linux kernels,
> >> see source code comment.
> >>
> >> Related (same problem in
On 11/8/23 19:35, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:03:09PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> For better compatibility with old linux kernels,
>> see source code comment.
>>
>> Related (same problem in ovmf):
>> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/c1e853769046
>
> Thanks. I'll
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:03:09PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> For better compatibility with old linux kernels,
> see source code comment.
>
> Related (same problem in ovmf):
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/c1e853769046
Thanks. I'll defer to your judgement on this. It does seem a
