On 10/16/19 5:19 PM, Sam Eiderman wrote:
Sure!
Philippe withdrew his R-b on 7/8, as I explained 7/8 is fine (only
need to remove a bad comment) the problem was in the tests 8/8 -
should I include the original R/b?
I withdrew it because John was preparing his pull request, and I needed
more ti
Sure!
Philippe withdrew his R-b on 7/8, as I explained 7/8 is fine (only
need to remove a bad comment) the problem was in the tests 8/8 -
should I include the original R/b?
I guess all other 1-6 are fine to add R/b...
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:07 PM John Snow wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/16/19 10:55 AM
On 10/16/19 10:55 AM, Sam Eiderman wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed comment Laszlo,
>
> Indeed my e-mail has changed and I only received replies to the
> commits where I added this new mail in the S-o-b section, should of
> added in all of them.
>
> So as you said it, the problem was actually
Thanks for the detailed comment Laszlo,
Indeed my e-mail has changed and I only received replies to the
commits where I added this new mail in the S-o-b section, should of
added in all of them.
So as you said it, the problem was actually in using qfw_cfg_get_u32
which assumes the value is encoded
On 10/16/19 2:14 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Hi Sam,
On 10/16/19 13:02, Sam Eiderman wrote:
Gentle Ping,
Philippe, John?
Just wondering if the series is okay, as Gerd pointed out this series
is a blocker for the corresponding changes in SeaBIOS for v 1.13
The QEMU series is still not merged, du
Hi Sam,
On 10/16/19 13:02, Sam Eiderman wrote:
> Gentle Ping,
>
> Philippe, John?
>
> Just wondering if the series is okay, as Gerd pointed out this series
> is a blocker for the corresponding changes in SeaBIOS for v 1.13
The QEMU series is still not merged, due to a bug in the last patch
(namel
