On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.02.2011, at 18:59, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/24/2011 11:46 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-02-24 18:27, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/24/2011 10:25 AM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:11, Anthony
On 24.02.2011, at 18:59, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/24/2011 11:46 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-02-24 18:27, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/24/2011 10:25 AM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:11, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws
wrote:
Is this
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:11, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Is this really necessary? The advantage to building globally is that it
keeps the code from getting unnecessary i386-isms.
Nop, is not necessary, I add this patch after this mail:
On 02/24/2011 10:25 AM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:11, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Is this really necessary? The advantage to building globally is that it
keeps the code from getting unnecessary i386-isms.
Nop, is not necessary, I add this
On 2011-02-24 18:27, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/24/2011 10:25 AM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:11, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Is this really necessary? The advantage to building globally is that it
keeps the code from getting unnecessary i386-isms.
On 02/24/2011 11:46 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-02-24 18:27, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/24/2011 10:25 AM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:11, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Is this really necessary? The advantage to building globally is