Re: Are user static builds really dynamically linked ?

2020-12-16 Thread Tj (Elloe Linux)
On 16/12/2020 11:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 16/12/20 12:07, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Something has definitely changed here. What you had with 4.2.1 >> is what you should be getting. The obvious suspect is that >> something weird happened in the meson conversion... Ubuntu/Debian maintainer reprod

Re: Are user static builds really dynamically linked ?

2020-12-16 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 16/12/20 12:07, Peter Maydell wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 06:39, Tj (Elloe Linux) wrote: user --static builds are apparently resulting in dynamically linked executables (to the glibc library, not other shared objects ) I think you mean that you end up with an executable that's dynamical

Re: Are user static builds really dynamically linked ?

2020-12-16 Thread Peter Maydell
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 06:39, Tj (Elloe Linux) wrote: > > user --static builds are apparently resulting in dynamically linked > executables (to the glibc library, not other shared objects ) I think you mean that you end up with an executable that's dynamically linked but although it requires the

Are user static builds really dynamically linked ?

2020-12-15 Thread Tj (Elloe Linux)
user --static builds are apparently resulting in dynamically linked executables (to the glibc library, not other shared objects ) Concise summary: $ file ../qemu-aarch64_v* ../qemu-aarch64_v4.2.1: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux), statically linked, BuildID[sha1]=70f5e10a