On 21/10/22 3:37 am, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:14:19PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
I had one concern, during recover we do not send any magic. As of now we
do not support multifd with postcopy so it
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:14:19PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> > I had one concern, during recover we do not send any magic. As of now we
> do not support multifd with postcopy so it should be fine, we can do
> explict checking for
On 19/10/22 2:30 am, Peter Xu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:18:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:15:35PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:18:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:15:35PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:18:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:15:35PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:06:00PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > >
>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:15:35PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:06:00PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > I was thinking for some solutions for this so wanted to discuss that
> >
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:06:00PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I was thinking for some solutions for this so wanted to discuss that before
> > going ahead. Also added Juan and Peter in loop.
> >
> > 1.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:06:00PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I was thinking for some solutions for this so wanted to discuss that before
> going ahead. Also added Juan and Peter in loop.
>
> 1. Earlier i was thinking, on destination side as of now for default
> and multi-FD
Hi Daniel,
I was thinking for some solutions for this so wanted to discuss that before
going ahead. Also added Juan and Peter in loop.
1. Earlier i was thinking, on destination side as of now for default and
multi-FD channel first data to be sent is MAGIC_NUMBER and VERSION so may be we
can
On 13/10/22 1:45 pm, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 01:23:40AM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Hope everyone is doing great. I have seen some live migration issues with
qemu-4.2 when using multiFD. Signature of issue is something like this.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 01:23:40AM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> Hope everyone is doing great. I have seen some live migration issues with
> qemu-4.2 when using multiFD. Signature of issue is something like this.
> 2022-10-01T09:57:53.972864Z qemu-kvm: failed to receive packet via
Hi Everyone,
Hope everyone is doing great. I have seen some live migration issues with
qemu-4.2 when using multiFD. Signature of issue is something like this.
2022-10-01T09:57:53.972864Z qemu-kvm: failed to receive packet via multifd
channel 0: multifd: received packet magic 5145564d expected
12 matches
Mail list logo
