Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries

2020-08-18 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 8/18/20 11:20 PM, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote: It's still shameful that MS is forcing developers to waste time rewriting API headers, just because the MS legal departments are not able to understand the needs of Open Source development. >>> There has be a big switch from Microsoft towa

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries

2020-08-18 Thread Sunil Muthuswamy
> >> It's still shameful that MS is forcing developers to waste time > >> rewriting API headers, just because the MS legal departments are not > >> able to understand the needs of Open Source development. > > There has be a big switch from Microsoft toward Open Source, I attended > > some of there

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries

2020-08-03 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Hi Sunil, On 8/1/20 1:31 AM, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote: >> Hi Justin, Sunil, > > Justin has moved to a different team is no longer working with WHPX. Moving > him > to bcc. OK. Does that mean you are the new responsible of updating the ticket regarding the WHPX headers and their license? > >> >>

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries

2020-07-31 Thread Sunil Muthuswamy
> Hi Justin, Sunil, Justin has moved to a different team is no longer working with WHPX. Moving him to bcc. > > On 5/20/20 12:26 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > +launchpad ticket > > > > On 9/20/19 6:53 PM, Justin Terry (VM) wrote: > >> Hey Phil, > >> > >> I have contacted our legal depart