On 8/18/20 11:20 PM, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote:
It's still shameful that MS is forcing developers to waste time
rewriting API headers, just because the MS legal departments are not
able to understand the needs of Open Source development.
>>> There has be a big switch from Microsoft towa
> >> It's still shameful that MS is forcing developers to waste time
> >> rewriting API headers, just because the MS legal departments are not
> >> able to understand the needs of Open Source development.
> > There has be a big switch from Microsoft toward Open Source, I attended
> > some of there
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:10:31AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04/08/2020 09.42, Stefan Weil wrote:
> > Am 04.08.20 um 09:23 schrieb Philippe Mathieu-Daudé:
> >
> >> On 8/4/20 8:55 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> >>> Am 04.08.20 um 08:43 schrieb Thomas Huth:
> >>>
> On 03/08/2020 22.25, Stefan We
On 04/08/2020 09.42, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 04.08.20 um 09:23 schrieb Philippe Mathieu-Daudé:
>
>> On 8/4/20 8:55 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>> Am 04.08.20 um 08:43 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>>>
On 03/08/2020 22.25, Stefan Weil wrote:
> We can add a CI pipeline on Microsoft infrastructure by usi
On 8/4/20 9:42 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 04.08.20 um 09:23 schrieb Philippe Mathieu-Daudé:
>
>> On 8/4/20 8:55 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>> Am 04.08.20 um 08:43 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>>>
On 03/08/2020 22.25, Stefan Weil wrote:
> We can add a CI pipeline on Microsoft infrastructure by using
Am 04.08.20 um 09:23 schrieb Philippe Mathieu-Daudé:
> On 8/4/20 8:55 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Am 04.08.20 um 08:43 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>>
>>> On 03/08/2020 22.25, Stefan Weil wrote:
We can add a CI pipeline on Microsoft infrastructure by using a GitHub
action.
>>> Sorry for being igno
On 8/4/20 8:55 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 04.08.20 um 08:43 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>
>> On 03/08/2020 22.25, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>> We can add a CI pipeline on Microsoft infrastructure by using a GitHub
>>> action.
>> Sorry for being ignorant, but how does that solve the legal questions
>> just bec
Am 04.08.20 um 08:43 schrieb Thomas Huth:
> On 03/08/2020 22.25, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> We can add a CI pipeline on Microsoft infrastructure by using a GitHub
>> action.
> Sorry for being ignorant, but how does that solve the legal questions
> just because it is running on GitHub instead of a diffe
On 03/08/2020 22.25, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 03.08.20 um 13:28 schrieb Stefan Weil:
>
>> Am 03.08.20 um 12:51 schrieb Philippe Mathieu-Daudé:
>>
>>> Hi Sunil,
>>>
>>> On 8/1/20 1:31 AM, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote:
The ask generally sounds reasonable. But, can you help me understand the
full
Am 03.08.20 um 13:28 schrieb Stefan Weil:
> Am 03.08.20 um 12:51 schrieb Philippe Mathieu-Daudé:
>
>> Hi Sunil,
>>
>> On 8/1/20 1:31 AM, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote:
>>> The ask generally sounds reasonable. But, can you help me understand the
>>> full
>>> scope of the ask. Few questions:
>>> 1. Stefan
Am 03.08.20 um 12:51 schrieb Philippe Mathieu-Daudé:
> Hi Sunil,
>
> On 8/1/20 1:31 AM, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote:
>> The ask generally sounds reasonable. But, can you help me understand the full
>> scope of the ask. Few questions:
>> 1. Stefan has a CI pipeline to build WHPX.
> Great! I didn't know
Hi Sunil,
On 8/1/20 1:31 AM, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote:
>> Hi Justin, Sunil,
>
> Justin has moved to a different team is no longer working with WHPX. Moving
> him
> to bcc.
OK. Does that mean you are the new responsible of updating the ticket
regarding the WHPX headers and their license?
>
>>
>>
> Hi Justin, Sunil,
Justin has moved to a different team is no longer working with WHPX. Moving him
to bcc.
>
> On 5/20/20 12:26 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > +launchpad ticket
> >
> > On 9/20/19 6:53 PM, Justin Terry (VM) wrote:
> >> Hey Phil,
> >>
> >> I have contacted our legal depart
019 8:18 AM
>>> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Justin Terry (VM)
>>> Cc: Daniel P . Berrangé ; Fam Zheng
>>> ; Thomas Huth ; Paolo Bonzini
>>> ; Alex Bennée ; Richard
>>> Henderson ; Eduardo Habkost ;
>>> Stefan Weil
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 8:18 AM
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Justin Terry (VM)
Cc: Daniel P . Berrangé ; Fam Zheng
; Thomas Huth ; Paolo Bonzini
; Alex Bennée ; Richard
Henderson ; Eduardo Habkost ;
Stefan Weil
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries
On 9/20/19 1:33
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190920113329.16787-1-phi...@redhat.com/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Message-id: 20190920113329.16787-1-phi...@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries
Typ
: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Justin Terry (VM)
> Cc: Daniel P . Berrangé ; Fam Zheng
> ; Thomas Huth ; Paolo Bonzini
> ; Alex Bennée ; Richard
> Henderson ; Eduardo Habkost ;
> Stefan Weil
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries
>
> On 9/20/19 1:33 PM, Phi
On 9/20/19 1:33 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Add a job to cross-build QEMU with WHPX enabled.
>
> Since the WHPX is currently broken, include the patch required to have
> successful Shippable build.
>
> I previously included the WHPX headers shared by the Android project,
> and Daniel aske
18 matches
Mail list logo
