RE: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?

2023-03-03 Thread Wang, Wei W
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 10:36 PM, Wang, Wei W wrote: > > On Thursday, February 16, 2023 9:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > > > Just to see what we are having now: > > > > > > - single qemu binary moved to next slot (moved to next week?) > > > Phillipe proposal > > > - TDX migration: we have

RE: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?

2023-02-24 Thread Wang, Wei W
Alexandre Iooss ; > Mahmoud Mandour ; Emilio Cota > ; kvm-devel ; Philippe Mathieu- > Daudé > Subject: RE: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call? > > On Thursday, February 16, 2023 9:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > > Just to see what we are having now: > > > &

RE: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?

2023-02-16 Thread Wang, Wei W
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 9:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > Just to see what we are having now: > > - single qemu binary moved to next slot (moved to next week?) > Phillipe proposal > - TDX migration: we have the slides, but no code > So I guess we can move it to the following slot, when

Re: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?

2023-02-16 Thread Juan Quintela
Alex Bennée wrote: > (replying all because qemu-devel rejected my email again) Just to see what we are having now: - single qemu binary moved to next slot (moved to next week?) Phillipe proposal - TDX migration: we have the slides, but no code So I guess we can move it to the following

Re: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?

2023-02-16 Thread Alex Bennée
Markus Armbruster writes: > Juan Quintela writes: > >> Alex Bennée wrote: >>> (replying all because qemu-devel rejected my email again) >>> >>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 10:19, Alex Bennée wrote: >>> Hi Juan, Do we have an agenda for next weeks KVM call yet? If there is space

Re: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?

2023-02-16 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 16/2/23 13:20, Markus Armbruster wrote: Juan Quintela writes: Alex Bennée wrote: (replying all because qemu-devel rejected my email again) On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 10:19, Alex Bennée wrote: Hi Juan, Do we have an agenda for next weeks KVM call yet? If there is space I'd like to take

Re: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?

2023-02-16 Thread Markus Armbruster
Juan Quintela writes: > Alex Bennée wrote: >> (replying all because qemu-devel rejected my email again) >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 10:19, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >>> Hi Juan, >>> >>> Do we have an agenda for next weeks KVM call yet? If there is space I'd >>> like to take some time to discuss

Re: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?

2023-02-16 Thread Juan Quintela
Alex Bennée wrote: > (replying all because qemu-devel rejected my email again) > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 10:19, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> Hi Juan, >> >> Do we have an agenda for next weeks KVM call yet? If there is space I'd >> like to take some time to discuss the future direction of icount.

Re: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?

2023-02-16 Thread Alex Bennée
(replying all because qemu-devel rejected my email again) On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 10:19, Alex Bennée wrote: > Hi Juan, > > Do we have an agenda for next weeks KVM call yet? If there is space I'd > like to take some time to discuss the future direction of icount. > > Specifically I believe there