All,
> Subject: Re: Qemu License question
>
>
> IMHO this is largely a non-issue from a licensing compatibility POV, and thus
> not neccessary for stable.
>
> This is self-contained test code that, IIUC, is not linking to the bits of
> QEMU
> that are GPLv-2-only, so i
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 13/06/2024 07.22, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Manos Pitsidianakis writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:26, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > The following files are marked as GPL-3.0-or-later. Will these
> > >
On 13/06/2024 07.22, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Manos Pitsidianakis writes:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:26, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi All,
The following files are marked as GPL-3.0-or-later. Will these
Conflict with Qemu LICENSE?
Should we update the files to GPL-2.0?
./tests/tcg/aarch64/semicall.h:7:
Manos Pitsidianakis writes:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:26, Peng Fan wrote:
>>Hi All,
>>
>>The following files are marked as GPL-3.0-or-later. Will these
>>Conflict with Qemu LICENSE?
>>
>>Should we update the files to GPL-2.0?
>>
>>./tests/tcg/aarch64/semicall.h:7: * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:26, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi All,
The following files are marked as GPL-3.0-or-later. Will these
Conflict with Qemu LICENSE?
Should we update the files to GPL-2.0?
./tests/tcg/aarch64/semicall.h:7: * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
./tests/tcg/x86_64/system/boot.S:1
