On 2024/9/27 22:20, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sept 2024 at 15:03, Chao Liu wrote:
On 2024/9/27 20:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sept 2024 at 09:52, Chao Liu wrote:
Even if our test set is not sufficiently comprehensive, we can create an
unimp_device for the maximum address space al
On Fri, 27 Sept 2024 at 15:03, Chao Liu wrote:
> On 2024/9/27 20:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Sept 2024 at 09:52, Chao Liu wrote:
>> Even if our test set is not sufficiently comprehensive, we can create an
>> unimp_device for the maximum address space allowed by the board. This
>> prev
On 2024/9/27 20:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sept 2024 at 09:52, Chao Liu wrote:
Hi, thank you for your prompt reply, it's a great encouragement to me!
Based on your review suggestions, I have improved the v1 patch.
By using create_unimplemented_device() during the initialization phase
On Fri, 27 Sept 2024 at 09:52, Chao Liu wrote:
>
> Hi, thank you for your prompt reply, it's a great encouragement to me!
>
> Based on your review suggestions, I have improved the v1 patch.
>
> By using create_unimplemented_device() during the initialization phase,
> I added a "znyq.umip" device e
