Dear Maintainers and Paolo,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to inquire about the
status of
the patch I submitted a month ago. Could you please provide any updates or
addtional comments regarding its review?
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Best regards,
Ewan
On 6/25/2
[snip]
> > Additionally, has_msr_vmx_vmfunc has the similar compat issue. I think
> > it deserves a fix, too.
> >
> > -Zhao
> Thanks for your reply. In fact, I've tried to process has_msr_vmx_vmfunc in
> the same
> way as has_msr_vmx_procbased_ctls in this patch, but when I tested on Linux
> kern
On 6/25/24 05:49, Zhao Liu wrote:
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
index 7ad8072748..a7c6c5b2d0 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -2386,6 +2386,7 @@ void kvm_arch_do_init_vcpu(X86CPU *cpu)
static int kvm_get_supported_feature_msrs(KVM
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 05:58:06AM -0400, EwanHai wrote:
> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 05:58:06 -0400
> From: EwanHai
> Subject: [PATCH v3] target/i386/kvm: Refine VMX controls setting for
> backward compatibility
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
>
> Commit 4a910e1 ("target/i386: do not set unsuppor
Sorry for my oversight, I am adding the maintainers who were
missed in the previous email.
On 6/24/24 05:58, EwanHai wrote:
Commit 4a910e1 ("target/i386: do not set unsupported VMX secondary
execution controls") implemented a workaround for hosts that have
specific CPUID features but do not supp
