On 11/08/2013 12:36 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:11:51 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy a...@ozlabs.ru wrote:
On 11/06/2013 12:53 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.11.2013 10:52, schrieb
Paolo Bonzini:
Il 05/11/2013 10:16, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06,
Am 08.11.2013 09:22, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
On 11/08/2013 12:36 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:11:51 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy a...@ozlabs.ru wrote:
On 11/06/2013 12:53 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.11.2013 10:52, schrieb
Paolo Bonzini:
Il 05/11/2013 10:16,
On 11/09/2013 12:20 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
When I am finally through with review of Igor's patches then he can
implement that for x86 and we/you can copy or adapt it for ppc. No need
to do big experiments for a concretely needed ppc feature.
Does it mean I better stop wasting your time and
Am 08.11.2013 15:57, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
On 11/09/2013 12:20 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
When I am finally through with review of Igor's patches then he can
implement that for x86 and we/you can copy or adapt it for ppc. No need
to do big experiments for a concretely needed ppc
On 11/06/2013 12:53 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.11.2013 10:52, schrieb
Paolo Bonzini:
Il 05/11/2013 10:16, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Why is the option under -machine
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:11:51 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy a...@ozlabs.ru wrote:
On 11/06/2013 12:53 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.11.2013 10:52, schrieb
Paolo Bonzini:
Il 05/11/2013 10:16, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il
Am 07.11.2013 10:11, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
On 11/06/2013 12:53 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 05.11.2013 10:52, schrieb
Paolo Bonzini:
Il 05/11/2013 10:16, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:53:14 +0100
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 05.11.2013 10:52, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 05/11/2013 10:16, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
On 06.11.2013, at 06:48, Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:25:32PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.09.2013, at 10:06, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
To be able to boot on newer hardware that the software support,
PowerISA defines a logical PVR, one per
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Why is the option under -machine instead of -cpu?
Because it is still the same CPU and the guest will still read the real
PVR from the hardware (which it may not support but this is why we need
compatibility mode).
How do you support
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Why is the option under -machine instead of -cpu?
Because it is still the same CPU and the guest will still read the real
PVR from the hardware (which it may not support
On 05.11.2013, at 03:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy a...@ozlabs.ru wrote:
On 10/01/2013 12:49 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09/30/2013 03:22 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 30.09.2013 21:25, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.09.2013, at 10:06, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
I realized it has been a
Il 05/11/2013 10:16, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Why is the option under -machine instead of -cpu?
Because it is still the same CPU and the guest will still read the real
On 05.11.2013, at 10:52, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 05/11/2013 10:16, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Why is the option under -machine instead of -cpu?
Il 05/11/2013 11:27, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:52, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 05/11/2013 10:16, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Why
On 11/05/2013 08:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 05/11/2013 10:16, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Why is the option under -machine instead of -cpu?
Because it is still the same
Il 05/11/2013 11:45, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Still in my opinion it should be -cpu, not -machine. Even if it's
just a virtual CPU model.
The compat option itself does not make much sense (yes we could just add
yet another CPU class and that's it) but with the
Am 05.11.2013 10:52, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 05/11/2013 10:16, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 05.11.2013, at 10:06, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Why is the option under -machine instead of -cpu?
Because it is still the same
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:06:04AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 14:57, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Why is the option under -machine instead of -cpu?
Because it is still the same CPU and the guest will still read the real
PVR from the hardware (which it may not support but
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:25:32PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.09.2013, at 10:06, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
To be able to boot on newer hardware that the software support,
PowerISA defines a logical PVR, one per every PowerISA specification
version from 2.04.
[snip]
+case
On 10/01/2013 12:49 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09/30/2013 03:22 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 30.09.2013 21:25, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.09.2013, at 10:06, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
I realized it has been a while since I got your response and did not answer
:) Sorry for the delay.
On 27.09.2013, at 10:06, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
To be able to boot on newer hardware that the software support,
PowerISA defines a logical PVR, one per every PowerISA specification
version from 2.04.
This adds the compat option which takes values 205 or 206 and forces
QEMU to boot
Il 30/09/2013 13:25, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 27.09.2013, at 10:06, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
To be able to boot on newer hardware that the software support,
PowerISA defines a logical PVR, one per every PowerISA specification
version from 2.04.
This adds the compat option
On 30.09.2013 21:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 13:25, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
On 27.09.2013, at 10:06, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
To be able to boot on newer hardware that the software support,
PowerISA defines a logical PVR, one per every PowerISA specification
version from
On 30.09.2013 21:25, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.09.2013, at 10:06, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
To be able to boot on newer hardware that the software support,
PowerISA defines a logical PVR, one per every PowerISA specification
version from 2.04.
This adds the compat option which takes
On 09/30/2013 03:22 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 30.09.2013 21:25, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.09.2013, at 10:06, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
To be able to boot on newer hardware that the software support,
PowerISA defines a logical PVR, one per every PowerISA specification
version from
26 matches
Mail list logo
