On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:41:43AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>Shouldn't the mode change to QXL_MODE_UNDEFINED on DESTROY_SURFACES?
> >>(I can see it currently doesn't, but it seems like a mistake)
> >
> >No, that is the point - this patch makes the lifetime of QXL_MODE_NATIVE be
> >
Hi,
Shouldn't the mode change to QXL_MODE_UNDEFINED on DESTROY_SURFACES?
(I can see it currently doesn't, but it seems like a mistake)
No, that is the point - this patch makes the lifetime of QXL_MODE_NATIVE be
the lifetime of the driver in the guest, kinda. we never unload the driver
in the
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:42:46AM +0300, yhalperi wrote:
> On 06/24/2011 04:02 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> >Currently we define the following relation between modes and primary surface
> >existance:
> >
> > QXL_MODE_COMPAT
> > QXL_MODE_NATIVE primary exists
> > QXL_MODE_UNDEFINED
> > QXL_MODE_VGA
On 06/24/2011 04:02 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
Currently we define the following relation between modes and primary surface
existance:
QXL_MODE_COMPAT
QXL_MODE_NATIVE primary exists
QXL_MODE_UNDEFINED
QXL_MODE_VGA primary doesn't exist
This, coupled with disallowing various IO's when not
