On 20.12.2013 17:27, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.12.2013 16:54, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.12.2013 16:30, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 20.12.2013 16:54, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.12.2013 16:30, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> On 20.12.20
On 20.12.2013 16:54, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.12.2013 16:30, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.12.2013 15:38, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 20.12.2013 16:30, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.12.2013 15:38, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> On 20.12.20
On 20.12.2013 16:30, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.12.2013 15:38, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.12.2013 14:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 20.12.2013 15:38, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.12.2013 14:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> On 20.12.20
The sync calls uses a trivial eventloop built into libnfs using poll().
Mixing the _async() and _sync() interfaces in libnfs means you may
risk running nested eventloops. Pain and tears lie behind that door.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 20.12.2013 15:38, Stefan Hajno
On 20.12.2013 15:38, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.12.2013 14:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.12.2013 13:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:48:41AM +0100, Peter Lieve
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 20.12.2013 14:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.12.2013 13:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:48:41AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> On
On 20.12.2013 14:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.12.2013 13:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:48:41AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Pet
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 20.12.2013 13:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:48:41AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> +
On 20.12.2013 13:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:48:41AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares without
the requ
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:48:41AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares without
> >>the requirement to actually mount the entire
On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares without
the requirement to actually mount the entire NFS share on the host.
NFS Images can simply be specified by an url of
Il 18/12/2013 18:21, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
> Not completely I think, but please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> If cache=writeback is set we issue just a write. In libnfs or libiscsi case
> that guarantees that the request has been successfully executed
> on the target / server. This is enough to
Am 18.12.2013 um 18:50 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.12.2013 um 18:33 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 18.12.2013 um 15:42 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
> On
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> Am 18.12.2013 um 18:33 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 18.12.2013 um 15:42 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>>>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Orit Wasserman
wrote:
>
Am 18.12.2013 um 18:33 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.12.2013 um 15:42 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
On 12/18/2013 01:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
>
>
>>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> Am 18.12.2013 um 15:42 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2013 01:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 17.12.2013 um 18:32 schrieb "Daniel P. Berrange"
> :
>>
Am 18.12.2013 um 11:38 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
> Il 18/12/2013 11:24, Orit Wasserman ha scritto:
For live migration we need the sync option (async ignores O_SYNC and
O_DIRECT sadly),
will it be supported? or will it be the default?
>>>
>>> Since this is bypassing the client
Am 18.12.2013 um 15:42 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
>> On 12/18/2013 01:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Am 17.12.2013 um 18:32 schrieb "Daniel P. Berrange"
:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Liev
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 01:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 17.12.2013 um 18:32 schrieb "Daniel P. Berrange"
>>> :
>>>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
This patch adds native support for accessing image
On 12/18/2013 01:11 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 18.12.2013 um 11:00 schrieb Orit Wasserman :
On 12/18/2013 01:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 17.12.2013 um 18:32 schrieb "Daniel P. Berrange" :
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
This patch adds native support for a
> Am 18.12.2013 um 11:00 schrieb Orit Wasserman :
>
>> On 12/18/2013 01:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>
>>
Am 17.12.2013 um 18:32 schrieb "Daniel P. Berrange" :
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
This patch adds native support for accessing images
Il 18/12/2013 11:24, Orit Wasserman ha scritto:
>>>
>>> For live migration we need the sync option (async ignores O_SYNC and
>>> O_DIRECT sadly),
>>> will it be supported? or will it be the default?
>>
>> Since this is bypassing the client kernel FS I/O layer question around
>> support of things li
On 12/18/2013 12:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:00:03PM +0200, Orit Wasserman wrote:
On 12/18/2013 01:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 17.12.2013 um 18:32 schrieb "Daniel P. Berrange" :
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
This patch adds
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:00:03PM +0200, Orit Wasserman wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 01:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Am 17.12.2013 um 18:32 schrieb "Daniel P. Berrange" :
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>>This patch adds native support for accessing i
On 12/18/2013 01:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 17.12.2013 um 18:32 schrieb "Daniel P. Berrange" :
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares without
the requirement to actually mount the entire NFS share on
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:03:24AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
>
> > Am 17.12.2013 um 18:32 schrieb "Daniel P. Berrange" :
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares without
> >> the requirement t
> Am 17.12.2013 um 18:32 schrieb "Daniel P. Berrange" :
>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares without
>> the requirement to actually mount the entire NFS share on the host.
>>
>> NFS Images can sim
> Am 17.12.2013 um 17:53 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>
> NFSTask
>
> Task is a very scsi-ish term. Maybe RPC is better ?
>
> NFSrpc ?
will change it in v3
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares with
> Am 17.12.2013 um 18:28 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> ...
+if (nfs_pwrite_async(client->context, client->fh
> Am 17.12.2013 um 23:51 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>
>>
Am 17.12.2013 um 18:13 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> ...
>>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
>
>> Am 17.12.2013 um 18:13 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> ...
Which NFS protocol versions are supported by current libnfs?
>>>
>>>
On 12/17/2013 03:36 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
>
>> Am 17.12.2013 um 18:13 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> ...
Which NFS protocol versions are supported by current libnfs?
>>>
>>> Will ch
> Am 17.12.2013 um 18:13 schrieb ronnie sahlberg :
>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> ...
>>> Which NFS protocol versions are supported by current libnfs?
>>
>> Will check that out. Ronnie?
>
> It uses NFS v3 only.
shoul
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares without
> the requirement to actually mount the entire NFS share on the host.
>
> NFS Images can simply be specified by an url of the form:
> nfs:
>
> For example:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
...
>>> +if (nfs_pwrite_async(client->context, client->fh,
>>> + sector_num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
>>> +
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
...
>> Which NFS protocol versions are supported by current libnfs?
>
> Will check that out. Ronnie?
>
It uses NFS v3 only.
On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares without
the requirement to actually mount the entire NFS share on the host.
NFS Images can simply be specified by an url of
NFSTask
Task is a very scsi-ish term. Maybe RPC is better ?
NFSrpc ?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares without
> the requirement to actually mount the entire NFS share on the host.
>
> NFS Images can simply
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> This patch adds native support for accessing images on NFS shares without
> the requirement to actually mount the entire NFS share on the host.
>
> NFS Images can simply be specified by an url of the form:
> nfs:
>
> For example:
42 matches
Mail list logo