On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:58:59AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:06:18 +0200
> > Peter Krempa wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:18 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > I'm not
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 18:20:35 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:06:18 +0200
> Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:18 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
[...]
> > First of the problem is the missing link between the NUMA topology
> > (currently
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:58:59 +0530
Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:06:18 +0200
> > Peter Krempa wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:18 +1000, David
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:06:18 +0200
> Peter Krempa wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:18 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > I'm not entirely sure if this is a good idea, and if it is whether
> > > this is a
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 05:06:18PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:18 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > I'm not entirely sure if this is a good idea, and if it is whether
> > this is a good approach to it. But I'd like to discuss it and see if
> > anyone has better ideas.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:06:18 +0200
Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:18 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > I'm not entirely sure if this is a good idea, and if it is whether
> > this is a good approach to it. But I'd like to discuss it and see if
> > anyone has
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:18 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure if this is a good idea, and if it is whether
> this is a good approach to it. But I'd like to discuss it and see if
> anyone has better ideas.
>
> As you may know we've hit a bunch of complications with cpu_index