Andreas Färber wrote:
>
> Am 24.07.2007 um 15:32 schrieb Clemens Kolbitsch:
>
>> i'm emulating i386 (what else when using windows *g*) [...]
>>
>> just in case someone knows :-)
>
> As far as I recall, in chronological order: alpha, ia64, amd64. ;-)
>
mips, alpha, ia64, amd64.
-hpa
> Am 24.07.2007 um 15:32 schrieb Clemens Kolbitsch:
> > i'm emulating i386 (what else when using windows *g*) [...]
> >
> > just in case someone knows :-)
>
> As far as I recall, in chronological order: alpha, ia64, amd64. ;-)
ok.. ok ... my fault ;-)
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:30:11PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
> Am 24.07.2007 um 15:32 schrieb Clemens Kolbitsch:
>
> >i'm emulating i386 (what else when using windows *g*) [...]
> >
> >just in case someone knows :-)
>
> As far as I recall, in chronological order: alpha, ia64, amd64. ;-)
Wh
Am 24.07.2007 um 15:32 schrieb Clemens Kolbitsch:
i'm emulating i386 (what else when using windows *g*) [...]
just in case someone knows :-)
As far as I recall, in chronological order: alpha, ia64, amd64. ;-)
Andreas
hi christian,
thanks for the reply... looks like a good explanation *gg* ... why didn't i
try that before posting (haven't done it yet, but looks reasonable :-) )??
greets!
> allocate more ram to your qemu guest
>
> it's the "-m" switch. Default is 128M, way too low
> for KDE.
>
> Try first 192,
allocate more ram to your qemu guest
it's the "-m" switch. Default is 128M, way too low
for KDE.
Try first 192, 256, and then 512 if you can afford it.
On 7/24/07, Clemens Kolbitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi!
i've got a questions... just out of curiosity: when emulating windows xp, i
get q
