Peter Maydell writes:
> On 19 October 2011 09:03, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> writes:
>>> both device models already support running without a drive as well by
>>> using a memory buffer instead so it would also be possible to make them
>>> use a read-only drive in a way that initial NAND/OneNAN
Am 19.10.2011 10:46, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 19 October 2011 09:03, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> writes:
>>> both device models already support running without a drive as well by
>>> using a memory buffer instead so it would also be possible to make them
>>> use a read-only drive in a way that
On 19 October 2011 09:03, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> writes:
>> both device models already support running without a drive as well by
>> using a memory buffer instead so it would also be possible to make them
>> use a read-only drive in a way that initial NAND/OneNAND contents would be
>> read fr
writes:
> On 18.10.11 16:38 , "ext Markus Armbruster" wrote:
>
>>$ qemu-system-arm -drive if=none,file=tmp.qcow2,readonly,id=foo
>>-device nand,drive=foo -kernel /dev/null
>>qemu: hardware error: nand_device_init: Unsupported NAND block size.
>>[...]
>>
>>Note that I didn't bother su
On 18.10.11 16:38 , "ext Markus Armbruster" wrote:
>$ qemu-system-arm -drive if=none,file=tmp.qcow2,readonly,id=foo
>-device nand,drive=foo -kernel /dev/null
>qemu: hardware error: nand_device_init: Unsupported NAND block size.
>[...]
>
>Note that I didn't bother supplying a drive wit
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 18 October 2011 14:38, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Yes, that way works:
>>
>> $ qemu-system-arm -drive if=mtd,file=tmp.qcow2,readonly
>> qemu-system-arm: -drive if=mtd,file=tmp.qcow2,readonly: readonly not
>> supported by this bus type
>>
>> But try this way:
>>
On 18 October 2011 14:38, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Yes, that way works:
>
> $ qemu-system-arm -drive if=mtd,file=tmp.qcow2,readonly
> qemu-system-arm: -drive if=mtd,file=tmp.qcow2,readonly: readonly not
> supported by this bus type
>
> But try this way:
>
> $ qemu-system-arm -drive if=
writes:
> On 18.10.11 11:23 , "ext Markus Armbruster" wrote:
>
>>These guys have been converted to qdev relatively recently.
>>
>>I wonder what happens when they use a drive defined with "-drive
>>if=none,readonly".
>>
>>If that's not a valid configuration, we better reject read-only drives,
>>l
On 18.10.11 11:23 , "ext Markus Armbruster" wrote:
>These guys have been converted to qdev relatively recently.
>
>I wonder what happens when they use a drive defined with "-drive
>if=none,readonly".
>
>If that's not a valid configuration, we better reject read-only drives,
>like ide_init_drive()
